<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Plagiarism Today - Latest Comments in Blogstamp: Certified Blog Timestamps</title><link>http://plagiarismtoday.disqus.com/</link><description>A site about content theft, plagiarism and copyright infringement issues on the Web.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:17:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blogstamp: Certified Blog Timestamps</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/03/28/blogstamp-certified-blog-timestamps/#comment-1346595</link><description>Sounds promising, but the big issue I can see is that authors may make tiny changes to content after a post has been submitted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's rare the time that I don't need to go back to my posts and fix an uncatched spelling error, or write an update to the post. Sounds like any of this would invalidate the time stamp (?)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maria</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:17:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>