<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Plagiarism Today - Latest Comments in Is Blog Content Licensing Dead?</title><link>http://plagiarismtoday.disqus.com/</link><description>A site about content theft, plagiarism and copyright infringement issues on the Web.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:45:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Blog Content Licensing Dead?</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/29/is-blog-content-licensing-dead/#comment-3981285</link><description>Hi Jonathan.  Read the article!  Great stuff... saved time.  Thanks!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:45:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Blog Content Licensing Dead?</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/29/is-blog-content-licensing-dead/#comment-3981278</link><description>Thanks for the information.  Read it and saved time!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:44:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Blog Content Licensing Dead?</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/29/is-blog-content-licensing-dead/#comment-1081160</link><description>Glad it was able to help! Please let me know if there are any cases you need help with or if there is anything that I can do!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plagiarismtoday</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:28:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Blog Content Licensing Dead?</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/29/is-blog-content-licensing-dead/#comment-1081039</link><description>Google's recent duplicate copy crack down has been beneficial to a degree in curbing this, but the plagiarism is still rampant.  For professional bloggers who actually earn a living (or large part of it) off blogging, protecting their content is worth almost any cost.  But for those of us who struggle to afford simple hosting, the cost involved in protecting our content is overwhelming. Therefore, we're wide open for the copy/paste bandits to take advantage of.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At any rate - thank you so much for the time and research you put into this post!  You did me a few new ideas to try.  Kudos and cookies!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aswanlund</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:03:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Blog Content Licensing Dead?</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/29/is-blog-content-licensing-dead/#comment-1037870</link><description>No, I wasn't aware of them, thank you for the link! I'll have to give them a closer look!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plagiarismtoday</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:59:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Blog Content Licensing Dead?</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/29/is-blog-content-licensing-dead/#comment-1037636</link><description>Jonathan, Another blog licensing company to add to your list is Newstex -  &lt;a href="http://newstex.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://newstex.com/&lt;/a&gt;   They pay for redistributing blog content.  While I am not going to get rich off of the royalties, it is nice to get a little payment each month from your content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anita</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bizjunky</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:42:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>