<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Plagiarism Today - Latest Comments in Legal and Ethical Link Blogging</title><link>http://plagiarismtoday.disqus.com/</link><description>A site about content theft, plagiarism and copyright infringement issues on the Web.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:25:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Legal and Ethical Link Blogging</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/09/12/legal-and-ethical-link-blogging/#comment-1347812</link><description>Andy: I'm going to download the ebook now and will probably give it a look this weekend if at all possible. You're right that marketing isn't my thing, but I am an advertising graduate so it isn't like there's nothing of interest to me in there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said, I think I better understand your point. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What there needs to be is a universal way, built into the RSS standard, to allow people to give the OK for content reuse or to deny it. Ideally, such a system would be able to set flexible rules such as no images, only 250 words or only one article at a time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the reason Google is stripping out these things is because they aren't in the RSS standard. Still, I do agree they should keep the header information in, it's just clear that improvement is needed on both sides of the fence here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:25:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Legal and Ethical Link Blogging</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/09/12/legal-and-ethical-link-blogging/#comment-1347810</link><description>The items I listed in my post are all added to the header for the feed, thus it is available to the reader when the content is picked up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On my article what I did (and still have in operation) is I used Feedburners own tool to add the no sharing with Yahoo Pipes and no index information, but the Bloglines code would be added in the same place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I then shared my own feed contents and linked to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In that shared feed the information is stripped out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can still have information added to your posts with a plugin, but that is not machine readable as I don't believe there is any proposed standard that works with individual feed items (though I could be wrong)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand some of the technology in this, but not like the real technology geeks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the most dangerous aspect of this isn't text, but licensed images which class as a complete work. You could get away with publishing to subscribers, but not free distribution and reuse elsewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know you are not into "marketing" stuff the same way I am, but there was a &lt;a href="http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/the-easy-way-to-syndicate-other-peoples-content-but.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;free report by Mike Filsaime&lt;/a&gt; that I encouraged people to download (yes it costs an email address and Mike does send occasional email promotions)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He has actually experienced a couple of costly legal problems with copyright which are enough to scare people which is why whilst so many bloggers don't agree with me, I keep fighting this uphill battle.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:24:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Legal and Ethical Link Blogging</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/09/12/legal-and-ethical-link-blogging/#comment-1347807</link><description>Andy: That is a point worth mentioning. I spoke with an attorney friend of mine the other day and she felt Google was on "thin ice" with Google Reader's linkblog tool. I do have a question though, that stripping you're talking about, is it something that appears on every single item in a feed or just in the header of the feed itself? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I read your great article on the topic but that wasn't completely clear to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, just a heads up, your site has a bug in Safari 3 that's causing the sidebar to appear below the text. It could be a glitch with Safari, but I wanted to let you know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:06:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Legal and Ethical Link Blogging</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/09/12/legal-and-ethical-link-blogging/#comment-1347808</link><description>Any data contained in the header of a feed such as the bloglines code for preventing sharing, or the feedburner code to prevent use with Yahoo Pipes gets stripped out by Google Reader when someone shares individual items.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:53:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Legal and Ethical Link Blogging</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/09/12/legal-and-ethical-link-blogging/#comment-1347809</link><description>Oh they remove licensing information from the feeds as well?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Recording Studio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:06:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Legal and Ethical Link Blogging</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/09/12/legal-and-ethical-link-blogging/#comment-1347811</link><description>You are missing out on Google Reader ignoring and removing licensing information contained in feeds.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:52:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>