<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Plagiarism Today - Latest Comments in Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://plagiarismtoday.disqus.com/</link><description>A site about content theft, plagiarism and copyright infringement issues on the Web.</description><atom:link href="https://plagiarismtoday.disqus.com/spam_bloggers_who_backdate/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:01:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-719696998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here are a few suggestions from an old article that I wrote. May help you some. &lt;a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/06/06/finding-the-age-of-a-page/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/06/06/finding-the-age-of-a-page/"&gt;http://www.plagiarismtoday....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:01:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-712663545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Johnathan, I'm a journalist and am pretty sure someone has stolen a big story of mine and backdated it to make it look like they published it before mine. How would I go about proving this? Is there a way of detecting the true date an article was published?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cameron lafelle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:02:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-5694508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know if it is a blogging "crime" but I would definitely encourage you to use the sticky post feature rather than backdating, it creates a lot of problems and confusion if you aren't clear about when a post was created.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:08:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-5694509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I sometimes backdate my post if I think other posts are deserving to be in the index. I don't know if it's a blogging crime&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qarla</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:22:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-1350307</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Trisha: If you have any tough cases, feel free to send me an email and have me look at them. I might be able to help. There are things that you can do, specifically filing a DMCA notice with the host, that can remove these sites even if you can't contact them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just send me the URLs of a couple of cases and I'll give it a quick look for you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hope that this helps!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 00:41:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-613944876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Trisha: If you have any tough cases, feel free to send me an email and have me look at them. I might be able to help. There are things that you can do, specifically filing a DMCA notice with the host, that can remove these sites even if you can&amp;amp;#039t contact them.Just send me the URLs of a couple of cases and I&amp;amp;#039ll give it a quick look for you. Hope that this helps!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:41:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-1350306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jonathan - I manage a large number of blogs for clients, and the biggest frustration I run into is that many of the scrapers I've had trouble with have no contact link or info on their sites (many of them are clearly just "made for adsense" sites), and even checking the domain via a Whois search often yields no results with the prevalence of private domain registration information - sometimes a registrar will respond, often not - so it's difficult to get the offending duplicate content removed when there's no one I can contact......clients don't like to hear "there's nothing we can do"..... I do report them to Google when I find them, but it would still be nice if there were other (easy) avenues or tools.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm really glad we have a resource like you to turn to for advice and help.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trisha</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:51:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-613944879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jonathan - I manage a large number of blogs for clients, and the biggest frustration I run into is that many of the scrapers I&amp;amp;#039ve had trouble with have no contact link or info on their sites (many of them are clearly just "made for adsense" sites), and even checking the domain via a Whois search often yields no results with the prevalence of private domain registration information - sometimes a registrar will respond, often not - so it&amp;amp;#039s difficult to get the offending duplicate content removed when there&amp;amp;#039s no one I can contact......clients don&amp;amp;#039t like to hear "there&amp;amp;#039s nothing we can do"..... I do report them to Google when I find them, but it would still be nice if there were other (easy) avenues or tools.  I&amp;amp;#039m really glad we have a resource like you to turn to for advice and help.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trisha</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:51:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-1350305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy: Thanks for the correction. I have no idea why I typed Doug but it has been fixed. That's what I get for being sleep deprived.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is strange that you mention that the SEO bloggers you know ignore scrapers. SEO bloggers are the most common group to approach me about stopping the problem. It is clear that there are a lot of varied opinions on this topic but it is safe to say I likely wouldn't have a business model without SEO bloggers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To each their own I say, I am here to help those that want to put a stop to it or at least reduce the instances.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:37:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-1350304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At the end of the day, most SEO bloggers I know either ignore scrapers or try to take advantage of them more. If they rank for your content, most likely you wouldn't have ranked for the term anyway, and the scrapers are siloing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the early days of a blogs life, I encourage blog scraping, syndication etc and continue to do so throughout its life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;p.s. it is Dave or David Naylor&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:16:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-613944870</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy: Thanks for the correction. I have no idea why I typed Doug but it has been fixed. That&amp;amp;#039s what I get for being sleep deprived.It is strange that you mention that the SEO bloggers you know ignore scrapers. SEO bloggers are the most common group to approach me about stopping the problem. It is clear that there are a lot of varied opinions on this topic but it is safe to say I likely wouldn&amp;amp;#039t have a business model without SEO bloggers.To each their own I say, I am here to help those that want to put a stop to it or at least reduce the instances.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:37:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Bloggers Who Backdate</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/27/spam-bloggers-who-backdate/#comment-613944873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At the end of the day, most SEO bloggers I know either ignore scrapers or try to take advantage of them more. If they rank for your content, most likely you wouldn&amp;amp;#039t have ranked for the term anyway, and the scrapers are siloing.In the early days of a blogs life, I encourage blog scraping, syndication etc and continue to do so throughout its life.p.s. it is Dave or David Naylor&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:16:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>