<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Plagiarism Today - Latest Comments in Warning Headers</title><link>http://plagiarismtoday.disqus.com/</link><description>A site about content theft, plagiarism and copyright infringement issues on the Web.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:48:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Warning Headers</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-1346025</link><description>I fear the problem is much more basic. Maybe these strategies do not work as well as they should, because most of the readers plagiarize, themselves! This is a question of values, and I get the sense that more and more people simply do not see anything wrong with plagiarism. Until we fix *that* problem, we are basically taking water out of the boat with a bucket to keep the Titanic from sinking. :-(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:48:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warning Headers</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-1346031</link><description>I'm thinking of turning off full post feeds because of this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MySmallVentures</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:21:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warning Headers</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-1346027</link><description>Worthwhile read. Thanks for writing on this topic. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've heard of linking back to yourself periodically for this and other reasons. And I'd heard that duplicate content lowers your search engine rank. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I hadn't thought about was how readers might be turned off by reading a warning. I tend to write whatever I want without thought to who my readers are and what they want to read. Obviously I'll have to try a little harder if I want to increase and maintain a large readership.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again for this insightful article.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elaine Vigneault</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:47:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warning Headers</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-1346023</link><description>Gayla,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just a heads up on this one, to get Google Adsense to respond to your request, you most likely will need to file a DMCA complaint with them. It's a pain, especially since it has to be faxed or mailed in and is legally dubious, and I've written about it before here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/08/31/adsense-and-the-dmca/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/08/31/adsen...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Give it a look if you're interested and, if you need any help, don't hesitate to send me an email.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good luck with your scraper!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:41:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warning Headers</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-1346024</link><description>Thanks for the call out on Dating Dames.  The one thing I made sure I did prior to making that particular post was to report them through their Google Ads.  Hopefully all these efforts combined will help :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again for all your efforts&lt;br&gt;Gayla</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gayla McCord</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:35:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>